
The daring, radical Pompidou Centre was derided by many when its design was first unveiled – but it has continued to affect the structure of public buildings ever since. Because the constructing approaches a significant renovation, its co-creator Renzo Piano recollects the furore.
This summer season, the Centre Pompidou will shut for 5 years, as Paris’s common polychrome landmark undergoes adjustments necessitated by present necessities by way of well being, security and vitality effectivity. French studio Moreau Kusunoki Architects, Mexican follow Frida Escobedo Studio and French engineer AIA Life Designers will undertake a significant overhaul of the six-storey arts centre, containing Europe’s largest museum of contemporary artwork. Its renovation will add usable flooring area, take away asbestos from all facades, enhance fireplace security and accessibility for folks with decreased mobility, and optimise vitality effectivity.

So far as attainable, the unique constructing can be conserved because it was earlier than. To do in any other case is likely to be thought of cultural sacrilege – after all of the Pompidou’s identification is indivisible from its unique architects, Renzo Piano, and the late Richard Rogers. The duo arrange their follow, Rogers + Piano, in 1970, and submitted a design to a prestigious competitors instigated in 1971 by Georges Pompidou, France’s President from 1969 till 1974. Its jury was headed up by Jean Prouvé, a metalworker and self-taught architect, and included such stellar architects as Philip Johnson and Oscar Niemeyer. Piano and Rogers’ design was chosen from 681 competitors entries.
The end result caught the duo, then unknowns of their 30s “with Beatles haircuts”, as Piano places it, abruptly: “We did not assume we would win, we entered the competitors for pleasure,” the Italian architect, now 87, tells the BBC. “We by no means deliberate to create a revolutionary constructing. Our thought was a museum that will encourage curiosity, not intimidate folks, and that will open up tradition to all.”
In truth, the duo’s insouciance might assist to elucidate the constructing’s uninhibited boldness, flamboyance and ludic high quality. Its structural components and providers have been positioned on its facades, permitting it to maximise its inner, open-plan areas – and prompting the futuristic construction to be dubbed the world’s first “inside-out” constructing. Its exoskeleton of tubes and periscope-like pipes have been playfully colour-coded: blue for air-conditioning, yellow for electrical energy, inexperienced for water and purple for pedestrian circulation. Guests streamed up escalators – encased in clear tubing affording panoramic views – that have been designed to strengthen the museum’s connection to town.
“Our thought was for the constructing to take up solely half the positioning, permitting for a welcoming outside place – a piazza – the place folks might meet,” says Piano, whose different initiatives embody the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco (rebuilt in 2008), the Shard (2012) in London, and the not too long ago accomplished Paddington Sq., additionally within the UK capital, a mixed-use constructing and public sq.. “Our credo was a spot for all folks – for the poor and wealthy, the younger and outdated.”
Tradition Shifters
Tradition Shifters is an interview collection through which high-profile creatives replicate on a piece of theirs which made a big effect on the world. Learn extra articles from the collection right here.
The Pompidou’s transparency, accessibility and adjoining piazza chimed with new concepts about democratising tradition. “Road theatre and live shows in public areas have been rising in recognition on the time,” says Piano.
Contained in the constructing, guests had entry to the Bibliothèque Publique d’Info – Paris’s first free public library – the Musée Nationwide d’Artwork Moderne and the Institut de Recherche et Coordination Acoustique/ Musique (IRCAM), devoted to analysis of music and sound.
Piano and Rogers’ successful entry provoked consternation and fury when it was introduced at a press convention: “The room was packed,” remembers Piano. “Richard and I have been standing in the course of the room being heckled. We felt elated but horrible on the identical time,” says the architect. “Some folks have been shouting, ‘Why have you ever designed one thing so horrible?’ ‘Why are you might be destroying Paris’s historic centre?'”

Though shocked to have gained the competition, Genoa-born Piano grew up feeling structure was his future – aged 18, he instructed his father he wished to be an architect. Nonetheless in dialog his method is humble, not entitled. Born right into a household of builders in Genoa, he cherished watching his father’s work take form. Maybe his childhood expertise of seeing buildings materialise efficiently made him really feel that structure is open to all potentialities. “Constructing is a wonderful gesture,” he as soon as instructed The Monetary Instances. “It is the alternative of destruction… particularly if you find yourself creating buildings for folks as a result of they’re civically necessary.” In 1981, Piano based the Renzo Piano Constructing Workshop (RPBW), with places of work in Genoa and Paris, led right this moment by 11 companions (within the spirit of a collective). In 1998, he gained the Pritzker Structure Prize.
The Plateau Beaubourg in central Paris – a stretch of wasteland occupied by a parking lot – was the positioning chosen for the brand new Musée Nationale d’Artwork Moderne (previously housed within the Palais de Tokyo in Paris’s haut-bourgeois sixteenth arrondissement). “It was a spot ready for one thing to occur,” says Piano.
A second of change
France’s social and political local weather on the time, nonetheless rebellious following the tumultuous occasions of Could 1968, was conducive to the creation of a constructing as disruptive because the Centre Pompidou, acknowledges Piano: “In Britain, society was being revolutionised by [designer] Mary Quant and the Beatles. The identical was taking place in Paris.” The Centre Pompidou was partly impressed by the ultra-pop structure of experimental London-based structure collective Archigram.

“The concept France ought to have a ‘Maison de la Tradition’, bringing collectively artwork, cinema, music and literature in cities was first invented by André Malraux [novelist, art theorist and France’s first Minister of Cultural Affairs]. Pompidou was very supportive, too. I actually consider that main shifts in structure are solely attainable when you’ve got a very good shopper. George’s spouse, Claude, too, was a superb woman.”
Pompidou, like Claude, was enthusiastic about up to date artwork and design. In 1972, they invited Pierre Paulin, a designer recognized for his space-age period furnishings, to create new interiors for the personal condominium of the Elysée Palace, the French presidents’ official residence. The outcomes have been radically trendy – the partitions of the lounge, eating room and smoking room have been lined to cocooning impact with wool and polyester panels that obscured the residence’s neo-classical splendour. Partitions have been hung with work by Robert Delaunay and different modernist artists.

One impetus behind these efforts to supply Paris with a prestigious museum was that France had misplaced its popularity because the world’s pre-eminent centre of avant-garde artwork. “It’s my passionate want for Paris to have a cultural centre like those they have been creating within the US,” Pompidou instructed Le Monde newspaper in 1972. “It will likely be each a museum and centre of creation, the place the visible arts take up residence with music, movie, books and audiovisual analysis.”
Initially, reactions to the Centre Pompidou, incessantly in comparison with an alien spaceship, have been typically extraordinarily damaging. “Taxi drivers used to say to me: ‘Regardez!’ earlier than launching right into a tirade in opposition to the constructing. With a lot hostility, I needed to maintain a low profile amongst strangers,” says Piano. The constructing, derisively likened by many to an “oil refinery”, was the goal of numerous lawsuits. “We have been sued so typically – as soon as on the grounds that Prouvé wasn’t a professional architect,” he recollects. The French press initially lambasted the constructing. “Paris has its personal monster, identical to the one in Loch Ness,” scoffed Le Figaro.
“Someday Richard and I have been exterior the constructing, as but unfinished. We noticed a lady scuffling with an umbrella that had turned inside out within the wind and Richard rushed over to assist repair it. When he talked about that he was one of many constructing’s architects, she jokily mimicked hitting him with the umbrella as if to counsel he was a naughty scoundrel.”
But after the constructing’s opening in 1977, Parisians quickly started to understand the museum – now certainly one of Paris’s most visited public establishments, that ranks behind solely the Louvre and Musée d’Orsay by way of customer numbers.
It additionally evokes architects right this moment. “The Centre Pompidou, radical on completion, has continued to affect the design of public buildings ever since,” says Hugh Broughton, founding father of London-based Hugh Broughton Architects, who finds qualities in it aside from its famously high-tech idiom. “It is an amazingly courageous, beneficiant constructing whose giant public area promotes congregation, road theatre and the best high quality people-watching. Its core idea – open-plan flooring plates supported by peripheral construction and providers – attracts upon medieval rules of chateau constructions, and combines this with an Arts and Crafts method that makes a advantage of building as an aesthetic medium. The result’s a constructing which is dynamic, inviting, egalitarian, clear and has superior views – all the very best attributes of nice structure. It modified the best way an entire technology of architects take into consideration buildings – putting their customers at centre stage.”

Piano can be recognized for harnessing mild in his initiatives to ethereal impact, as is the case with the Shard, which might appear to vanish in sure mild circumstances as a consequence of its glass pores and skin. Structure critic Nicolai Ouroussoff has mentioned of his works as an entire: “The serenity of Renzo Piano’s greatest buildings can virtually make you consider we dwell in a civilised world.”
For Piano, what’s the major architectural legacy of the Pompidou Centre? “The constructing is proof that tradition does not endure from being extra public. It is a spot the place folks collect primarily. It brings collectively artwork, life and tradition – not tradition with an enormous C however tradition with a small c. When it opened, it introduced tradition to all, and made town a greater place for it.”