In 2004, John Conmeans and Alexander Soifer, each working on mathematics at Princeton University, submitted to the American Mathematical Monthly what they believed was “a brand new world report within the number of phrases in a [math] paper.”
Soifer explains: “On April 28, 2004 … I submitted our paper that included simply two phrases, ‘n2 + 2 can’ and our two drawings. [See one of them above.]” The story then continues: “The American Mathematical Monthly was surprised, and didn’t know what to do about our new world report of a 2‑phrase article. Two days later, on April 30, 2004, the Editorial Assistant Mrs. Margaret Combs acknowledged the receipt of the paper”:
The Monthly publishes exposition of mathematics at many levels, and it contains articles each lengthy and brief. Your article, however, is a bit too brief to be a very good Monthly article… A line or two of explanation would actually assist.
Soifer writers: “The identical day on the cofcharge hour I requested John [Conway], ‘What do you assume?’ His reply was concise, ‘Don’t hand over too easily.’ Accordingly, I replied [to] The Monthly the identical day”:
I respectfully disagree {that a} brief paper typically—and this paper particularly—merely attributable to its dimension have to be “a bit too brief to be a good Monthly article.” Is there a connection between quantity and quality?… Now we have posed a positive (in our opinion) open problem and reported two distinct “behold-style” proofs of our advance on this problem. What else is there to elucidate?
Soifer provides: “The Monthly, apparently felt outgunned, for on Might 4, 2004, the reply got here from The Monthly’s high gun, Editor-in-Chief Bruce Palka”:
The Monthly publishes two forms of papers: “articles,” that are substantive expository papers ranging in size from about six to twenty-five pages, and “notes,” that are briefer, frequently somewhat extra technical items (typically within the one-to-five web page vary). I can ship your paper to the notes editor if you want, however I anticipate that he’ll not be interested in it both due to its size and lack of any substantial accompanying textual content. The standard means wherein we use such brief papers as of late is as “boxed filler” on pages that would othersmart contain plenty of the clean house that publishers abhor. If you happen to’d permit us to make use of your paper in that means, I’d be happy to publish it.
Soifer concludes: “John Conmeans and I settle fored the ‘filler’, and within the January 2005 difficulty our paper was published.” Victory!
Get extra of the againstory right here.
Related Content:
The Briefest-Recognized Paper Published in a Serious Math Journal: Two Succinct Sentences
John Nash’s Tremendous Brief PhD Thesis: 26 Pages & Two Citations
